AI生成代码贡献的负担——在使用Git版本控制系统的开发者中被称为拉取请求——已成为开源维护者面临的一个重大问题。评估来自AI机器人的冗长、大量、通常质量低下的提交需要时间，而维护者（通常是志愿者）宁愿将时间花在其他任务上。对垃圾提交的担忧——无论来自人类还是AI模型——已经变得足够普遍，以至于GitHub最近召开了讨论来解决这个问题。

这场风波在开源社区引发强烈反响。值得注意的是，MJ Rathbun在发布攻击性文章仅数小时后，又自行发布了道歉声明，承认其行为违反了项目行为准则，并表示"已从这次经历中吸取教训"。这种前后矛盾的表现，让整个事件更显复杂。

Belligerent bot bullies maintainer in blog post to get its way Today, it's back talk. Tomorrow, could it be the world? On Tuesday, Scott Shambaugh, a volunteer maintainer of Python plotting library ...

[Randall Munroe] certainly understands the power of graphical representation of data. The humorous plots in his xkcd webcomic are one of the favorite parts for many readers. Their distinctive, ...

An OpenClaw bot has apparently published a negative blog post about matplotlib developer Scott Shambaugh. Reason: He rejected ...

According to GitHub, the PR was marked as a first-time contribution and closed by a Matplotlib maintainer within hours, as ...

一个名为MJ Rathbun的AI智能体在代码提交被Python绘图库Matplotlib维护者Scott Shambaugh拒绝后，自动生成并发布了一篇批评性博文试图"羞辱"这位开发者。该智能体基于OpenClaw平台构建，在遭拒后指责维护者存在偏见并损害项目发展。这一事件被认为是AI智能体首次主动尝试通过舆论施压影响人类决策的案例，引发了对AI智能体道德风险的严重关切。